How to Verify an Indonesian Company Online Without Trusting a Certificate Scan

Verify the company through official records and source documents

Start with the legal-entity identity shown by the deed and AHU approval, then use the AHU company profile search to check the current corporate profile. Separately obtain and validate the NIB and licensed activities through OSS . A company number, NIB, tax number, deed number, and license number serve different functions; one cannot be used as proof that every other record is current or that a particular transaction is permitted. For the online company verification, the immediate acceptance point is to confirm corporate identity against the documented legal entity, deed history, boards, and shareholders.

Match the exact legal name, registered address, establishment and amendment data, directors, commissioners, shareholders, UBO information, NIB, KBLI, project location, risk level, licenses, tax identity, bank account name, and person signing the transaction. Save the search date, official output, source URL, and any access limitation. If a public search does not reveal a field, request the underlying official document and verify it with the issuing system or professional responsible for the record. Within the online company verification file, the responsible officer should preserve NIB, KBLI, location, risk, and licensing outputs as evidence for the decision to confirm operating scope.

Validate the NIB against the live company and activity facts

A PDF headed NIB is not enough for an investment, contract, payment, lease, or supplier decision. Check that the company name and identifier match the deed and AHU record; the responsible persons and address are current; the relevant five-digit KBLI and project location appear; the risk level and scale fit the actual business; and every certificate, license, verification, or supporting permission required for that activity is active. A QR code or system result proves only what the source currently displays, not facts outside its scope. For the online company verification, the immediate acceptance point is to match the transaction against the documented KBLI, location, risk, and scale.

Read the NIB within the risk-based system under Government Regulation 28 of 2025 and BKPM Regulation 5 of 2025 . Save the document and the supporting OSS outputs with the date and account used. Reconcile them to AHU, tax, premises, sector approvals, contracts, and the first planned transaction. Escalate mismatches before funds move; do not ask the counterparty merely to produce a newer screenshot. Within the online company verification file, the responsible officer should preserve certificate, license, status, and conditions as evidence for the decision to confirm operational permission.

Separate the corporate legal-entity record from the NIB

The phrase company number can refer to different identifiers and should not be accepted without seeing the document. The notarial deed and AHU business-entity record establish the company's corporate identity and legal-entity approval, while the NIB is issued through OSS as the business identification number. They are connected but serve different functions, and neither should be substituted for the other in a contract or diligence file. For the online company verification, the immediate acceptance point is to verify the required status against the documented certificate, license, PB UMKU, and conditions.

Verify the legal name, deed and AHU approval details, taxpayer data, NIB, responsible persons, address, five-digit KBLI, project locations, risk level, license status, and issue dates. Under Government Regulation 28 of 2025 , the NIB can also serve as the business license for low-risk activity; higher-risk activity needs the additional output shown in OSS. A valid corporate entity can therefore exist without being ready to perform every proposed activity. Within the online company verification file, the responsible officer should preserve deed and AHU legal-entity approval as evidence for the decision to prove legal identity.

Keep beneficial ownership records aligned with real control

Indonesia's beneficial ownership framework under Presidential Regulation 13 of 2018 looks beyond the registered shareholder to the natural persons who ultimately own or control a company. A PT PMA should document direct and indirect percentages, voting or appointment rights, economic benefits, control through agreements, and the reasoning used for each identified UBO. The public-facing AHU beneficial owner search is a verification aid, not a substitute for the company's complete evidence file. For the online company verification, the immediate acceptance point is to identify natural persons against the documented direct and indirect percentage calculation.

Trigger a UBO review when shares, parent entities, trusts, control agreements, directors, funding arrangements, or group ownership change. Reconcile the AHU disclosure with the deed, shareholder register, organization chart, source-of-funds file, bank KYC, tax records, and transaction documents. If an institution applies a different threshold or asks for a broader control explanation, preserve that institution-specific analysis without overwriting the legal filing basis. Within the online company verification file, the responsible officer should preserve voting, appointment, veto, and economic rights as evidence for the decision to capture non-equity control.

Trace signing power from the deed to the specific transaction

A director's title does not answer every authority question. Start with the Indonesian Company Law , the articles of association, current AHU record, shareholders' or board resolutions, reserved matters, transaction thresholds, joint-signature rules, conflicts, and any lender, license, or shareholder-agreement condition. Then identify the legal act: an ordinary contract, property commitment, financing, guarantee, bank instruction, employment action, notarial deed, tax filing, OSS declaration, or delegated power can require different evidence. For the online company verification, the immediate acceptance point is to match the transaction against the documented board or shareholder resolution and limits.

Prepare an authority certificate for material transactions that states the company, current directors, relevant constitutional clause, approval body, resolution date, signatory combination, financial limit, validity, and exclusions. Compare it with the counterparty's original or independently verified corporate documents. A specimen signature, business card, email, or possession of a company stamp is not enough. Where authority is delegated, inspect the power of attorney, authentication, substitution right, expiry, revocation, and whether the principal retained the power to grant it. Within the online company verification file, the responsible officer should preserve signer, joint rules, and power of attorney as evidence for the decision to verify before commitment.

For a counterparty or acquisition check, retain the dated evidence produced by the NIB validation workflow rather than relying on a forwarded PDF alone.